Don Giovanni: Rebel Hero or Threat to Society

by ttucker23 on April 25, 2009

Simon keenleyside as Don Giovanni at the Royal Opera House, London, 2008.

Simon Keenleyside as Don Giovanni at the Royal Opera House, London, 2008.

The character of Don Giovanni in Mozart’s opera personifies two contrasting aspects of the Enlightment:

  1. The embodiment of liberty. Don Giovanni sees himself as exempt from the laws of state, society, culture and religion. In this sense he is the Enlightenment hero, an extreme example of the idea of liberty that marks the age.
  2. The embodiment of social disruption. Here he is the destroyer of liberty in others. His moral liscentiousness leads him to ignore oaths and promises, break up relationships and marriages and disrupt the distinctions in status that hold society together.

The conflict between these complementary and contrasting aspects of Don Giovanni is what drives the drama.

Don Giovanni as Rebel Hero

The comic element of the opera is drawn from the first definition described above: Don Giovanni as the emobdiment of liberty.

We delight in Don Giovanni’s trickery and play and are amused by his antics. This side of his character coincides with what the German poet Friedrich Schiller (a contemporary of Mozart) promoted as a classical aesthetic that transends the duality of the rational/formal and the material/sensual. As Nicholas Till says in his excellent book Mozart and the Enlightenment:

[Schiller] characterised aesthetic freedom, famously, as play – a self-fulfilling activity which liberates the sensual from material determination, re-admitting it to the airy dance of the ideal. For Schiller the play-drive was the ultimate expression of the ‘purposeful purposelessness’ of aesthetic freedom.

In On the Aesthetic Nature of Man, Schiller tells us how we can achieve the classical ideal of aesthetic social order:

We are likely to find it, like the pure Church and pure Republic, only in a few chosen circles, where conduct is governed, not by some soulless imitation of the manners and morals of others, but by the aesthetic nature we have made our own.

In this respect Don Giovanni represents the Enlightenment ideal of political and social liberty. The refrain of ‘Vive la libertà’ which Giovanni, Leporello, Don Ottavio, Donna Anna and Donna Elvira sing together during the finale of Act 1 highlights the ambiguity of the term within the opera, but as Julian Rushton points out in Don Giovanni (Cambridge Opera Handbook), the political implications of ‘Viva la libertà’ were taken seriously enough by the Austrian censorship in the nineteenth century for it to be changed in Italy to ‘Viva la società’.

Another element of Giovanni’s character which enhances the idea of his heroic status is his complete lack of fear. He displays a super-human courage in the two key climaxes of the work:

  • The Act 1 finale, where the five characters threaten him with the vengeance of heaven and he replies ‘My courage shall not fail me, though the powers of hell assail me.’
  • The finale of Act 2, where he says ‘no man shall call me coward’ and refuses to repent and change his life even in the face of everlasting suffering.

It is worth bearing in mind that in the final scenes of the opera Giovanni’s fate is not sealed, and that he is offered the chance to repent and go to heaven rather than hell. His steadfast refusal here is almost Nietzschian in its conception of invididuality, and in his refusal to compromise the full realisation of his own nature. One is forced to admire Giovanni here, as Nicholas Till says:

With his desperate, defiant denial he becomes a triumphant yea-sayer, prepared to plead his values of individual freedom at the bar of heaven itself. In this moment, as the scene is written by Mozart, it is almost impossible not to identify with Don Giovanni and adopt him as some sort of existential rebel: a rebel whom Camus was to describe as ‘A man who says no: but whose refusal does not imply renunciation,’ and who prefers ‘the risk of death to a denial of the rights that he defends.’

Don Giovanni as Social Threat

But of course there is a dark side to Don Giovanni. He is a ‘harbinger of chaos’. His liscentiousness, his breaking of oaths and promises, his flouting of taste, convention and manners, and his dismissal of all social conventions threaten the fabric of society itself.

The first scene alone sees him attempting the rape of an aristocratic lady betrothed to another and then murdering her father. Major crimes against society and its institutions are committed by Giovanni within the first 15 minutes of the action (and what an opening!).

Later he attempts to break up the marriage of Zerlina and Masetto before it has begun, and commits an act of violence on Masetto when he seeks revenge. It is clear that this kind of extreme individuality cannot operate within society.

Don Giovanni manifests disruption thorugh the confusion of social hierarchy that his actions bring about. We know from Leporello’s famous catalogue aria that amongst his conquests he counts country wenches, burghers’ wives, lower gentry, baronesses, princesseses and ‘every shape of female figure, every class and every age’. During the course of the opera we see him attempt to seduce a lady, a maid and a peasant, representatives of all three social classes.

This social breakdown is highlighted in one of the most extraordinary musical moments of the opera. During the Act 1 finale three dances are played together: menuetto, follia and alemanna are superimposed on top of one another, each dance representing the separate classes of aristocrat, peasant and bourgeoisie. The combination of distinct types of music, in different metres, treads a fine line between the harmonious and the grotesque, and highlights the dangers of disrupting social structures.

YouTube Preview Image
Don Giovanni, Act 1 Finale, performed at the New York Met, April 1990, conducted by James Levine. Note the three dance styles superimposed on each other, and the ensuing chaos, before the abrupt interruption of the three maskers 1 minute 56 seconds into this excerpt.

Don Giovanni: Hero or villain?

So which are we to take as the real Giovanni? Is he hero or villain? The answer has to be both, but this raises questions about the morality of the opera and what we should make of its ultimate meaning.

Nicholas Till makes a persuasive case for seeing Don Giovanni as a representative of the general artistic character, indeed an expression of Mozart himself, through what he calls ‘the subversive artistic spirit’.

Like Giovanni, the absolute artist remains uncommited to anything or anyone which will constrain his freedom; he breaks promises and defies threats. Like Giovanni, the artist must adopt chameleon disguises to penetrate into the world of others and assume that ‘negative capability‘ that Keats believed to be so important to the poet.

Mozart’s music is often effused with playfulness, not just in Don Giovanni but throughout his work. His Musical Joke, K.522, was written around the time he was writing Don Giovanni, and his love of dance forms is a clear indicator of the play drive in his music.

The Act 1 finale with its distorted dance themes takes on extra significance in this respect, as an expression not just of social disharmony but of Mozart’s skill as a composer. It demonstrates a virtuosic display of compositional skills to fit together three different dances, each in its own metre, and still produce music that makes sense as a whole (Mozart was later to elevate this technique to the level of the sublime with the remarkable fugal ending of his Jupiter Symphony).

Consider also this description of Mozart by Andreas Schachtner, a Salzburg trumpeter who knew Mozart and worked with him closesly (quoted in Mozart and the Enlightenment by Nicholas Till):

I think that if he had not had the advantage of good education which he enjoyed, he might have become the most wicked villain, so susceptible was he to every attraction, the goodness or badness of which he was not yet able to imagine.

As an artist Mozart expresses to us, through Giovanni, his own humanity. He thereby dramatises every human being’s desire to extend their individuality into the world and live life by their own rules.

At the same time we are made aware of the tensions between this expressive individuality and the social boundaries that help to keep these forces under control.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Video: Analysis of Don Giovanni

by ttucker23 on April 9, 2009

This video from San Diego Opera Talk series provides a useful analysis of the opera Don Giovanni by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Lorenzo Da Ponte.

Nick Reveles talks through some of the dramatic and musical elements of the opera, providing insight into some of the themes of the work and the effects that Mozart and Da Ponte use to bring the characters alive and provide substance to the drama.

If you’re interested in the musical analysis, skip straight to 8 minutes 45 seconds. It’s not overly technical and doesn’t require musical knowledge to follow.

At 24 minutes and 15 seconds, Nick Reveles talks through the best recordings of the work on CD.

YouTube Preview Image
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Mozart, Don Giovanni: Best Recorded Version

by ttucker23 on March 30, 2009

I like a mix of different approaches with my favourite classical works. For Don Giovanni, the opera by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, there are three clear choices, which critics (at least in the UK and Europe) unanimously highlight.

1. Don Giovanni: The Traditional Account

Don Giovanni, performed by the Philharmonia Chorus and Orchestra, conducted by Carlo Maria Giulini.

Philharmonia Chorus and Orchestra, conducted by Carlo Maria Giulini.

Don Giovannia performed by the Philharmonia Chorus and Orchestra, conducted by Carlo Maria Giulini and issued on EMI. The wonderful cast includes Eberhard Wachter, Elizabeth Schwarzkopf and Dame joan Sutherland.

The Penguin Guide to Classical Music 2003/4 (2009 version available here) designates this as a ‘key recording’:

Sets the standard by which all other recordings have come to be judged. Elizabeth Schwarzkopf, as Elvira, emerges as a dominant figure to give a distinctive but totally apt slant to this endlessly invigorating drama.

The Gramaphone Classical Music Guide 2005 (2009 version available here) also rates this highly:

Although this set is over 40 years olds, none of its successors is as skilled in capturing the piece’s drama so unerringly… one of the most apt casts every assembled for the piece.

2. Don Giovanni: The Live Period Instrument Version

Don Giovanni performed by the Monteverdi Choir and English Baroque Soloists, conducted by John Elliot Gardiner.

Monteverdi Choir and English Baroque Soloists, conducted by John Elliot Gardiner.

Don Giovanni performed by the Monteverdi Choir and English Baroque Soloists, conducted by John Eliot Gardiner and issued on Archiv.

The Penguin Guide calls it ‘a recording that sets new standards for period performance and vies with the finest of traditional versions’:

John Eliot Gardiner’s set is recorded mainly live, and the result is vividly dramatic, beautifully paced nad deeply expressive. The performance culminates in one of the most thrilling accounts ever recorded of the final scene, when Giovanni is dragged down to hell.

The Gramphone Guide is equally effusive:

For sheer theatrical elan complemented by the live recording, Gardiner is among the best, particularly given a recording that’s wonderfully truthful and lifelike.

3. Don Giovanni: The Classic

Don Giovanni performed by the Vienna Philharmonic, conducted by josef Krips.

Vienna Philharmonic, conducted by Josef Krips.

Don Giovanni performed by the Vienna State Opera Chorus and the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, conducted by Josef Krips and issued on Decca.

I haven’t heard this myself, but the Penguin Guide gives this its highest honour, the coveted Rosette status:

Krips’s version, recorded in 1955 for the Mozart bicentennary, has remained at or near the top of the list of recommendations ever since. Its intense dramatic account of the Don’s disappearance into hell has rarely been equalled and never surpassed on CD. The finale to Act I is also electrifying. The reading is pretty age defying, full and warm, with a lovely Viennese glow which is preferable to many modern recordings.

If anyone has any other recommendations, please add them to the comments below.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Mozart’s Don Giovanni: Resources and Links

by ttucker23 on March 26, 2009

don_g_poster3

Poster for the Toronto Opera production of Mozart's Don Giovanni, 2004.

The following links offer useful resources for analysis of Mozart’s opera Don Giovanni.

Analysis

Libretto

Scores

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

The Culture Club: Theme for March-May 2009

by ttucker23 on March 24, 2009

Francisco d'Andrade as Don Giovanni in Mozart's opera, painted by Max Slevogt, 1912.

Francisco d'Andrade as Don Giovanni in Mozart's opera, painted by Max Slevogt, 1912.

March-May 2009

This time we’re looking at the Don’s – Giovanni and Juan (although we’re saving Quixote for a future session).

These two are based on the same story, the legend of Don Juan, which probably first saw light of day as the play El burlador de Sevilla y convidado de piedra (The Trickster of Seville and the Stone Guest) by Tirso de Molina, published in Spain around 1630.

I’m very excited that we’re tackling Mozart at last, and especially this opera, which many think the finest of all (including Kierkegaard, who called it ‘a work without blemish, of uninterrupted perfection’ – see this essay on Kierkegaard’s view of Don Giovanni).

  • Don Giovanni – music by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, libretto by Lorenzo Da Ponte (opera)
  • Don Juan – Lord Byron (poem)
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Samuel Johnson’s Truth

by ttucker23 on March 5, 2009

Samuel Johnson, painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds around 1769.

Samuel Johnson, painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds around 1769.

Every serious artist must take a position with regards to truth. Samuel Johnson’s position is fascinating, because it seems to involve vast contradictions and yet manages to resolve them in a world view that is consistent.

Adherence to truth is a fundamental tenet for Johnson, as we see throughout his own writings and his conversations in Boswell’s Life of Johnson.  Here is one of the best descriptions from Boswell’s Life:

Next morning, while we were at breakfast, Johnson gave a very earnest recommendation of what he himself practised with the utmost conscientiousness: I mean a strict attention to truth, even in the most minute particulars. ‘Accustom your children (said he), constantly to this; if a thing happened at one window, and they, when relating it, say that it happened at another, do not let it pass, but instantly check them; you do not know where deviation from truth will end.
Life of Johnson by James Boswell, page 899.

Johnson goes on to say: ‘It is more from carelessness about truth than from intentional lying, that there is so much falsehood in the world.’

As Mrs Thrale herself objects, it seems hardly possible to follow such a practice. Indeed, throughout Boswell’s Life of Johnson we see countless contradictions between what he says and what he does. But Johnson was wise enough to understand that within these contradictions lies the essence of humanity. As he says in Rambler 14:

Nothing is more unjust, however common, than to charge with hypocrisy him that expresses zeal for those virtues, which he neglects to practise; since he may be sincerely convinced of the advantages of conquering his passions, without having yet obtained the victory.

Johnson is only too aware of man’s inability to live how he knows he ought. ‘A man writes much better than he lives.’ But as Philip Davis says in his essay ‘The life of Samuel Johnson’ (published in The Cambridge Companion to Samuel Johnson):

Precisely because the whole of his meaning was never contained in a single great work, Johnson stands for the life that always lies outside literature as well as within it. In that way, by refusing to make great writing separate from efforts at ordinary living, Johnson is the the finest of human encouragers.

Johnson’s truth, then, exists in the balance between idealism and practicality. It is fully conscious of the contradiction, and even encourages it, for it is in this gap that the human condition takes place. Johnson’s essay in Adventurer 11 provides the kind of encouragement Davis was referring to (quoted by Philip Davis in ‘The life of Samuel Johnson’):

To strive with difficulties, and to conquer them, is the highest human felicity; the next, is to strive, and deserve to conquer: but he whose life has passed without a contest, and who can boast neither success nor merit, can survey himself only as a useless filler of existence; and if he is content with his own character, must owe his satisfaction to insensibility.

This is what makes us human, and it is only a full commitment to truth that makes this possible. As he says to Boswell in the Life of Johnson: ‘Without truth there is a dissolution of society’.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Quotes by Samuel Johnson

by ttucker23 on February 26, 2009

Samuel Johnson, painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds.

Samuel Johnson, painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds.

I finally finished Bowell’s Life of Johnson. At 1402 pages, this is probably the longest book I’ve ever read, but it was worth every minute.

While a couple of the members of The Culture Club were unhappy with its weight, and thought it needed serious editing, there were three of us who thought its great breadth and detail one of its major strengths. And while it’s impossible to deny that there is superfluous matter, what would you cut? Everyone would choose differently, and I am glad that it’s survived the editor’s scalpel.

The Johnson that emerges through the pages of Boswell was one of the great wits of his age, a genius writer, lexicographer and conversationalist. Anyone familiar with his work and the representation of him in Boswell’s Life will have their favourite Johnson quotes. Here are some of mine, chosen for their humanity, wisdom and wit:

A gentleman having to some of the usual arguments for drinking added this: ‘You know, Sir, drinking drives away care, and makes us forget whatever is disagreeable. Would not you allow a man to drink for that reason?’ JOHNSON. ‘Yes, Sir, if he sat next you.’ Quoted by James Boswell, Life of Johnson, page 493.

In a letter to James Boswell, regarding Boswell’s wife, who hated having Johnson to stay: ‘She is a sweet lady, only she was so glad to see me go, that I have almost a mind to come again, that she may again have the same pleasure.’ Quoted by James Boswell, Life of Johnson, page 559.

‘No, Sir: before dinner men meet with great inequality of understanding; and those who are conscious of their inferiority, have the modesty not to talk. When they have drunk wine, every man feels himself happy, and loses that modesty, and grows impudent and vociferous: but he is not improved; he is only not sensible of his defects.’
Life of Johnson, page 746.

‘Every man is to take existence on the terms on which it is given to him. To some men it is given on condition of not taking liberties, which other men may take without much harm. One man may drink wine, and be nothing the worse for it; on another, wine may have effects so inflammatory as to injure him both in body and mind, and perhaps, make him commit something for which he may deserve to be hanged.’
Life of Johnson, page 757.

‘A great city is, to be sure, the school for studying life; and “The proper study of mankind is man,” as Pope observes.’
Life of Johnson, page 918.

‘All theory is against the freedom of the will; all experience for it.’
Life of Johnson, page 947.

‘Without truth there must be a dissolution of society.’
Life of Johnson, page 948.

‘Society is held together by communication and information.’
Life of Johnson, page 949.

‘Courage is a quality so necessary for maintaining virtue, that it is always respected, even when it is associated with vice.’
Life of Johnson, page 1295.

Johnson having argued for some time with a pertinacious gentleman; his opponent, who had talked in a very puzzling manner, happened to say, ‘I don’t understand you, Sir:’ upon which Johnson obsserved, ‘Sir, I have found you an argument; but I am not obliged to find you an understanding.’
Life of Johnson, page 1308.

For a comprehensive collection of Samuel Johnson quotes visit the Samuel Johnson Sound Bite Page.

More articles on Johnson on the Culture Club blog:

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Samuel Johnson and the End of Certainty

by ttucker23 on February 15, 2009

Samuel Johnson, as painted by his friend Sir Joshua Reynolds.

Samuel Johnson, as painted by his friend Sir Joshua Reynolds.

Johnson’s character betrays striking contradictions, which are particularly interesting because they represent his age, a turning point in human ideas that was so profound it continues to resonate with us today.

What marks Johnson is the contrast between what might be called his ‘weighty assertiveness’ and on the other hand his radical scepticism. Or to put it another way, the conflict between certainty and doubt.

The ‘weighty assertiveness’ is the public side of Johnson, the writer, scholar, essayist and conversationalist. Boswell’s Life of Johnson depicts this side of Johnson magnificently, capturing in extraordinary detail his rational observations and quickness of thought.

This is often associated, by Boswell and others, with his masculinity. The printer William Strahan’s description of Johnson’s character in a letter to one of the Secretaries of the Treasury, designed to secure Johnson a seat in the House of Commons, is typical of those who knew him:

He possesses a great share of manly, nervous, and ready eloquence; is quick in discerning the strength and weakness of an argument; can express himself with clearness and precision, and fears the face of no man alive.

There is a strong sense of this ‘assertive’ Johnson as being at the centre of London society. The Reverend Dr Maxwell says of him (quoted in Boswell’s Life of Johnson):

He generally had a levee of morning visitors, chiefly men of letters; Hawksworth, Goldsmith, Murphy, Langton, Steevens, Beauclerk, &c. &c… He seemed to me to be considered as a kind of publick (sic) oracle, whom every body thought they had a right to visit and consult; and doubtless they were well rewarded.

This is an apt observation, because what society clearly needed at this revolutionary time was an oracle. During the age of rationalism and enlightenment, the huge steps forward in ideas and thought were bought at a cost, that being the loss of all certainty. There emerged a philosophy of scepticism, notably the writing and thinking of David Hume and George Berkeley, which radically altered the way that the universe was considered, and left all previous certainties in doubt, including such strongholds as the relationship between cause and effect, the reality of material objects and the existence of God.

Johnson’s staunch, masculine, ineluctable views on all topics that he came to consider were a powerful corrective to the decline in certainties. One famous anecdote in Boswell’s Life of Johnson illustrates this beautifully:

After we came out of the church, we stood talking for some time together of Bishop Berkeley’s ingenious sophistry to prove the non-existence of matter, and that every thing in the universe is merely ideal. I observed, that though we are satisfied his doctrine is not true, it is impossible to refute it. I never shall forget the alacrity with which Johnson answered, striking his foot with mighty force against a large stone, till he rebounded from it, ‘I refute it thus.

Johnson’s inner scepticism

The contrasting side of Johnson’s character is displayed in his more private, inward life. In Boswell’s biography of Johnson this often emerges through his fear of madness, death and the afterlife. Whenever these subjects are discussed his mood changes and the doubts come flooding in:

Boswell (to Johnson): ‘But may we not fortify our minds for the approach of death?’ Here I am sensible I was in the wrong, to bring before his view what he ever looked upon with horrour (sic); for although when in a celestial frame, in his ‘Vanity of human Wishes’, he has supposed death to be ‘kind Nature’s signal for retreat,’ from this state of being to ‘a happier seat’, his thoughts upon this aweful (sic) change were in general full of dismal apprehensions. His mind resembled the vast amphitheatre, the Coliseum at Rome. In the centre stood his judgement, which, like a mighty gladiator, combated those apprehensions that, like the wild beasts of the Arena, were all around in cells, ready to be let out upon him. After a conflict, he drove them back into their dens; but not killing them, they were still assailing him. To my question, whether we might not fortify our minds for the approach of death, he answered, in a passion, ‘No, Sir, let it alone. It matters not how a man dies, but how he lives. The act of dying is not of importance, it lasts so short a time.’ He added, (with an earnest look,) ‘A man knows it must be so, and submits. It will do him no good to whine.’ I attempted to continue the conversation. He was so provoked, that he said, ‘Give us no more of this;’ and was thrown into such a state of agitation, that he expressed himself in a way that alarmed and distressed me; shewed an impatience that I should leave him, and when I was going away, called to me sternly, ‘Don’t let us meet to-morrow.’

And another instance from Boswell’s Life of Johnson:

…while his friends in their intercourse with him constantly found a vigorous intellect and a lively imagination, it is melancholy to read in his private register, ‘My mind is unsettled and my memory confused. I have of late turned my thoughts with a very useless earnestness upon past incidents. I have yet got no command over my thoughts; an unpleasing incident is almost certain to hinder my rest.’ What philosophick (sic) heroism was it in him to appear with such manly fortitude to the world, while he was inwardly so distressed!

Duality in the History of Rasselas

Of Johnson’s own writings, the work which best expresses this duality of thought is The History of Rasselas. Fred Parker describes this novel (in his essay ‘The skepticism of Rasselas’, published in the Cambridge Companion to Samuel Johnson) as ‘resting on the notion of the instability of the human mind’. Here the two conditions of his attitude are perfectly poised, so artfully that it is easy to overlook how difficult a balance this is to achieve.

Consider the opening sentence of Rasselas, which uses the typical ‘assertive’ Johnsonian voice to sow the seeds of a profound scepticism:

Ye who listen with credulity to the whispers of fancy, and pursue with eagerness the phantoms of hope, who expect that age will perform the promises of youth, and that the deficiencies of the present day will be supplied by the morrow, attend to the history of Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia.

It is the great irony of The History Rasselas that the wise generalisations typical of Johnson are ‘precisely what Rasselas goes in search of, but under the pressure of experience finds continually to break down’ (Fred Parker, The skepticism of Rasselas). The interplay between Rasselas and the poet Imlac is key to this irony, and the following exchange is perhaps its highest pitch – here we see the two sides of Johnson, the assertive and the cynical, in perfect balance, as Imlac describes the qualities that constitute a poet:

(Imlac) ‘He must divest himself of the prejudices of his age and country; he must consider right and wrong in their abstracted and invariable state; he must disregard present laws and opinions, and rise to general and transcendental truths, which will always be the same…’ Imlac now felt the enthusiastic fit, and was proceeding to aggrandize his own profession, when the prince cried out, ‘Enough! thou hast convinced me that no human being can ever be a poet. Proceed with thy narration.’

It is impossible to detect which side of this dialogue Johnson himself would represent, and this is because Johnson stands for the interplay of them both.

The extraordinary scene in the catacombs that precedes the final chapter confirms this dualism. Death is considered, and the existence of the soul discussed. But this is not the final but the penultimate chapter, and here even death is not treated as a conclusion, but a kind of stasis, wherein the whole company stand awhile ’silent and collected.’

The dualism is sustained right through to the work’s final irony, with the ‘Conclusion in which nothing is concluded’. What could be more divorced from our view of the assertive ‘Dr Johnson’ than an inability to conclude? It is this quality that makes the work very difficult to sum up, as Fred Parker observes in his essay ‘The skepticism of Rasselas’:

The History of Rasselas can’t be defined as positive, negative, or even balanced in its view of life. Rather than being a statement about life it is ‘imbued with life itself’.

This is the central problem of Johnson’s age, the age of rationalism and so-called ‘enlightenment’, in which the human condition requires new certainties to replace the ones which are being eradicated. Johnson is still relevant today because this central conflict between certainty and doubt has yet to be resolved.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

The Culture Club: Theme for January-February 2009

by ttucker23 on January 10, 2009

The theme for these two months is Samuel Johnson, plus a bit of Schubert. Apparently these two were Samuel Beckett’s favourite artists (but that’s a coincidence). There’s a lot of stuff here, so we’re allowed to skim the Boswell for the best bits about Johnson!

Samuel Johnson

  • The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia (prose)
  • The Life of Mr Richard Savage (prose)
  • Plan and Preface to a Dictionary of English (prose)
  • On the Death of Dr Robert Levet (poem)
  • The Vanity of Human Wishes (poem)
  • The Rambler no. 32 [Stoicism] (periodical essay)
  • The Rambler no. 60 [Biography] (periodical essay)
  • The Adventurer no. 67 [The Benefits of Human Society] (periodical essay)
  • The Adventurer no. 85 [The Role of the Scholar] (periodical essay)
  • The Idler no. 61 [How to Become a Critic (1)] (periodical essay)
  • The Idler no. 62 [How to Become a Critic (2)] (periodical essay)
  • The Idler no. 85 [Autobiography] (periodical essay)
  • The Idler no. 89 [Limitations of Human Achievement] (periodical essay)

James Boswell

  • The Life of Samuel Johnson (biography)

Franz Schubert

  • Piano Trio No. 1 in B flat, Op.99 D.898
  • Piano Trio No.2 in E flat, Op.100 D.929
  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Campaign to make Jeremy Prynne the new poet laureate

by ttucker23 on November 27, 2008

jh-prynne

Charlotte Higgins is only joking, in her piece on the Guardian Culture blog: Jeremy Prynne for poet laureate!

But I think it’s a great idea. He may write obscure and difficult poems, but wouldn’t it be refreshing to get the nation scratching its head on a regular basis? And after all, he is the most important living English poet.

The campaign starts here. Make J.H. Prynne the new poet laureate!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }